<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why TechCrunch is Brilliant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homethinking.com/brontemedia/2007/02/13/why-techcrunch-is-brilliant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homethinking.com/brontemedia/2007/02/13/why-techcrunch-is-brilliant/</link>
	<description>There are those who experiment and those who follow the formula</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:44:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: michael arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.homethinking.com/brontemedia/2007/02/13/why-techcrunch-is-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-13187</link>
		<dc:creator>michael arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homethinking.com/brontemedia/2007/02/13/why-techcrunch-is-brilliant/#comment-13187</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks very much. Just one thing to note - the company raised it&#039;s first round at the beginning of 2005, so it was spent over a two year period. That may or may not change your analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks very much. Just one thing to note &#8211; the company raised it&#8217;s first round at the beginning of 2005, so it was spent over a two year period. That may or may not change your analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
